View : 300 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이지은*
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-03T16:30:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-03T16:30:59Z-
dc.date.issued2022*
dc.identifier.issn2288-5919*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-32509*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/262842-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated how artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis (AI-CAD) for breast ultrasonography (US) influences diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists with varying experience levels in different workflows. Methods: Images of 492 breast lesions (200 malignant and 292 benign masses) in 472 women taken from April 2017 to June 2018 were included. Six radiologists (three inexperienced [<1 year of experience] and three experienced [10-15 years of experience]) individually reviewed US images with and without the aid of AI-CAD, first sequentially and then simultaneously. Diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement were calculated and compared between radiologists and AI-CAD. Results: After implementing AI-CAD, the specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy significantly improved, regardless of experience and workflow (all P<0.001, respectively). The overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve significantly increased in simultaneous reading, but only for inexperienced radiologists. The agreement for Breast Imaging Reporting and Database System (BI-RADS) descriptors generally increased when AI-CAD was used (κ=0.29-0.63 to 0.35-0.73). Inexperienced radiologists tended to concede to AI-CAD results more easily than experienced radiologists, especially in simultaneous reading (P<0.001). The conversion rates for final assessment changes from BI-RADS 2 or 3 to BI-RADS higher than 4a or vice versa were also significantly higher in simultaneous reading than sequential reading (overall, 15.8% and 6.2%, respectively; P<0.001) for both inexperienced and experienced radiologists. Conclusion: Using AI-CAD to interpret breast US improved the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of radiologists regardless of experience level. AI-CAD may work better in simultaneous reading to improve diagnostic performance and agreement between radiologists, especially for inexperienced radiologists. © 2022 Korean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (KSUM).*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherKorean Society of Ultrasound in Medicine*
dc.subjectBreast neoplasms*
dc.subjectDiagnosis, Computer-assisted artificial intelligence*
dc.subjectUltrasonography*
dc.titleDiffering benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue4*
dc.relation.volume41*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.indexKCI*
dc.relation.startpage718*
dc.relation.lastpage727*
dc.relation.journaltitleUltrasonography*
dc.identifier.doi10.14366/usg.22014*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85139515855*
dc.author.googleLee S.E.*
dc.author.googleHan K.*
dc.author.googleYouk J.H.*
dc.author.googleLee J.E.*
dc.author.googleHwang J.-Y.*
dc.author.googleRho M.*
dc.author.googleYoon J.*
dc.author.googleKim E.-K.*
dc.author.googleYoon J.H.*
dc.contributor.scopusid이지은(35746498800)*
dc.date.modifydate20240301081003*
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE