View : 551 Download: 0

Optimal treatment strategies for small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective multi-center study (KROG 19-03)

Title
Optimal treatment strategies for small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective multi-center study (KROG 19-03)
Authors
Cho, Won KyungPark, WonKim, Young SeokKang, Hyun-CheolKim, Jin HeeKim, Kyung SuChoi, Kyu HyeChang, Sei KyungAhn, Ki JungLee, Seok HoKim, SunghyunKim, JureeEom, Keun-YongLee, JeongshimLee, Jong HoonChoi, Jin Hwa
Ewha Authors
김경수
SCOPUS Author ID
김경수scopus
Issue Date
2021
Journal Title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
ISSN
0301-2115JCR Link

1872-7654JCR Link
Citation
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY vol. 258, pp. 396 - 400
Keywords
Small cell carcinomaNeoplasm of uterine cervixCervical cancer
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Objective: This multi-institutional study aimed to identify the optimal treatment strategy for small cell carcinoma of the cervix. Study design: We retrospectively collected the medical records of 166 patients diagnosed with small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix from January 2000 to December 2015 from 13 institutions of the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. After excluding 18 (10.8 %) patients who initially had distant metastasis, the treatment outcomes of 148 patients were analyzed. Results: After a median 46.4 (1.4-231.9) months of follow-up, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of all patients were 45.9 % and 63.5 %, respectively. Distant metastasis was the dominant pattern of failure occurring in 67 patients (45.3 %). We stratified the patients according to the primary local treatment: primary surgery (n = 119), primary radiotherapy (RT) (n = 26), and no local treatment group (n = 3). Although the primary RT group had advanced disease (FIGO stage >= IIB) more frequently than the primary surgery group (80.8 % vs. 47.9 %), the PFS and OS did not differ between the groups in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Definitive RT is a reasonable local treatment option for small cell cervical cancer, particularly for advanced cases. Given the high rates of distant relapse, an effective systemic therapy protocol is warranted for small cell cervical cancer patients. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
DOI
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.034
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE