View : 483 Download: 0

A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Comparing ICS thorn LABA with ICS plus LABA plus LAMA in Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) Treatment: The ACO Treatment with Optimal Medications (ATOMIC) Study

Title
A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Comparing ICS thorn LABA with ICS plus LABA plus LAMA in Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO) Treatment: The ACO Treatment with Optimal Medications (ATOMIC) Study
Authors
Park, So-YoungKim, SolmiKim, Jung-HyunKim, Sae-HoonLee, TaehoonYoon, Sun-YoungKim, Min-HyeMoon, Ji-YongYang, Min-SukJung, Jae-WooKim, Joo-HeeChoi, Jeong-HeePark, Chan SunKim, SujeongLee, JaechunKwon, Jae-WooHur, Gyu YoungKim, Sang-HaKim, Hee-KyooShin, Yoo SeobKim, Sang-HoonNam, Young-HeeJang, An-SooPark, Seo YoungKim, Tae-Bum|Cohort Reality Evolution Adult Ast
Ewha Authors
조영주김민혜
SCOPUS Author ID
조영주scopusscopus; 김민혜scopus
Issue Date
2021
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE
ISSN
2213-2198JCR Link

2213-2201JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1304 - +
Keywords
Asthma-COPD overlapICSLABALAMATriple therapy
Publisher
ELSEVIER
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap (ACO) recommend initial treatment using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) plus 1 or more bronchodilators. OBJECTIVE: To clarify which therapeutic effect is better between the ICS D long-acting beta(2) agonist (LABA) and ICS D LABA D long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) treatment in patients with ACO. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, 48-week, randomized, noninferiority trial. Patients with ACO were enrolled if they were treated with a moderate to high dose of ICS D LABA. In total, 303 patients were involved in the present trial, with 149 receiving ICS D LABA D LAMA. The primary end point was the time to first exacerbation. Secondary outcomes included changes in FEV1, forced vital capacity, FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio, asthma control, blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide. RESULTS: In the ICS D LABA treatment group, 29 of 154 patients (18.83%) experienced exacerbation, whereas 28 of 149 patients (18.79%) experienced exacerbation in the ICS D LABA D LAMA treatment group. The results of this noninferiority study were ultimately inconclusive (hazard ratio, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.66-1.84). However, the patients treated with the addition of LAMA showed significant improvements in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (P <.001). Asthma control did not improve in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study was unable to conclude that ICS D LABA treatment is not inferior to ICS D LABA D LAMA in terms of exacerbation, it is obvious that the ICS D LABADLAMA treatment group had improved lung function in ACO. (C) 2020 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
DOI
10.1016/j.jaip.2020.09.066
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE