View : 688 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author오진환-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T16:30:15Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-24T16:30:15Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1088-6931-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-27780-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/255182-
dc.description.abstractThis study empirically tests the effectiveness of two main aid modalities, conventional project-type aid and modern program-type aid, on a country’s economic growth and its budget expenditures. With respect to growth, neither type of aid showed a significant positive effect. In terms of fiscal response, however, both modalities indeed appeared to increase public expenditures in partner countries. This study specifically examines the case of Tanzania, among the countries where program-based approach (PBA) is most active. Tanzanian data support the abovementioned empirical findings; the country’s PBA, a specifically results-based approach (RBA) as an advanced version of PBA, is indeed positively related to government expenditures. © 2019 People and Global Business Association.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherPeople and Global Business Association-
dc.subjectAid Effectiveness-
dc.subjectAid Modality-
dc.subjectPanel Data-
dc.subjectProgram-Based Approach-
dc.subjectResults-Based Approach-
dc.titleEffectiveness of aid modalities on government financing: With reference to Tanzania-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.issue4-
dc.relation.volume24-
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS-
dc.relation.indexKCI-
dc.relation.startpage90-
dc.relation.lastpage104-
dc.relation.journaltitleGlobal Business and Finance Review-
dc.identifier.doi10.17549/gbfr.2019.24.4.90-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85078402903-
dc.author.googleHan S.-
dc.author.googleOh J.-
dc.contributor.scopusid오진환(55462887900)-
dc.date.modifydate20210901081001-
Appears in Collections:
국제대학원 > 국제학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE