View : 712 Download: 0

Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Title
Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detecting Meniscal Ramp Lesions in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Authors
Koo, BoyeonLee, Sun HwaYun, Seong JongSong, Jae Gwang
Ewha Authors
이선화
SCOPUS Author ID
이선화scopusscopusscopus
Issue Date
2020
Journal Title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
ISSN
0363-5465JCR Link

1552-3365JCR Link
Citation
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2051 - 2059
Keywords
ramp lesionsmeniscocapsular junctionanterior cruciate ligamentmagnetic resonance imagingmeta-analysis
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Review
Abstract
Background: The clinical importance of meniscal ramp lesions in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear has emerged as a major issue. However, the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting ramp lesions has a wide range. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MRI for diagnosing ramp lesion in patients with ACL tear. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed based on the revised guidelines for the PRISMA DTA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) statement. Diagnostic performance studies using MRI as the index test and arthroscopy as the reference standard for ramp lesion were included. Bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Meta-regression analyses were performed to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Results: The review and meta-analysis included 9 studies from 8 articles (883 patients with ACL tear and reconstruction). The summary sensitivity, summary specificity, and area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic for ramp lesion were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59-0.81), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.88-0.97), and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), respectively. Among the potential covariates, magnet strength (P < .01), patient knee position (P = .04), and MRI interpreter (P = .04) were associated with heterogeneity in terms of sensitivity, whereas magnet strength (P = .03) was associated with heterogeneity in terms of specificity. Conclusion: MRI demonstrated moderate sensitivity and excellent specificity for diagnosing ramp lesion. Routine arthroscopic assessment is recommended for the presence of ramp lesion, regardless of whether it is suspected on MRI. Further clinicoradiological studies of diagnostic algorithms are needed for identifying ramp lesion, including high-resolution MRI with appropriate knee position.
DOI
10.1177/0363546519880528
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE