View : 42 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.advisor이인표-
dc.contributor.author정은미-
dc.creator정은미-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-13T16:33:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-13T16:33:13Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000159090-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/common/orgView/000000159090en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/251125-
dc.description.abstractThis study is aimed at estimating ad-valorem equivalents (AVEs) of non-tariff measures on products subject to China Compulsory Certification (CCC). Based on the model of Ghodsi et al.(2016a), this research asks the following questions: (i) Do Technical Barriers to Trade (TBTs) imposed on products subject to CCC have a negative impact (a decrease in import) or a positive impart (an increase in import)?; (ii) Do Mutual Recognition of Agreements (MRAs) have a positive effect on import?; (iii) Do Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) have a positive effect on import? I ran 13 pooled ordinary least squares regressions to estimate the impact of the two different types of NTMs on imports, MRA, and FTA. As a result, estimated AVEs aggravate MFN tariffs by additional 10.2% on average. In case of MRA, it didn’t show a positive impact on import. On the other hand, FTA indicated the positive impact on China’s imports on average, though half of the tariff lines showed a negative impact on import. ;본 연구는 중국강제인증제도(CCC) 대상 제품에 대한 비관세조치의 관세상당치를 추정하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 수량기준 계량경제학 방식을 기초로 하여 다음과 같은 연구 문제를 분석하였다. (i) CCC 대상 제품에 부과된 무역상 기술장벽(TBT)이 중국의 수입에 부정적인 영향(수입의 감소) 또는 긍정적인 영향(수입의 증가)을 끼치는가? (ii) 상호인증협정(MRA)은 중국의 수입에 긍정적인 영향을 끼치는가? (iii) 자유무역협정(FTA)은 수입에 긍정적인 영향을 끼치는가? 비관세조치와 MRA 및 FTA의 효과를 알아보기 위해 13개의 합동 최소자승법(pooled OLS)의 회귀식을 추정하였다. 그 결과 추정된 비관세장벽의 평균 관세상당치 10.2%가 최혜국대우 실행세율에 추가적으로 부과됨을 알 수 있었다. 상호인증협정은 중국의 수입에 부정적인 영향을 보였으며, 자유무역협정은 중국의 무역에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsI. INTRODUCTION 1 A. Research Motivation 1 B. Research Method and Structure 3 C. Literature Review 4 II. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND 7 A. Non-Tariff Measures 7 1. The definition of NTMs 7 2. Classification of NTMs 8 3. Trends in NTMs 11 4. Trade effect of NTMs 14 B. Review of NTMs Quantification Methods 17 1. Frequency index and import coverage ratio 17 2. Price-based and quantity-based approaches 18 C. Methods of Estimating Ad Valorem Equivalent of NTMs 20 III. REGIONAL BACKGROUND: CHINA 23 A. Trade 23 1. Chinas trade policies and non-tariff measures 23 2. Current status of Chinas Trade 25 B. China Compulsory Certification 29 1. Overview 29 2. Current status of CCC 31 IV. ESTIMATING AVE OF NTMs ON PRODUCTS SUBJECT TO CCC 34 A. Methodology 34 B. Data 38 C. Empirical Results 40 1. The pooled OLS regression model 40 2. Diagnosis test 44 V. CONCLUSION 47 A. Implication for trade policy 47 B. Limitation of Study 48 List of references 49 Appendix 59 Abstract in Korean 70-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1623656 bytes-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 국제대학원-
dc.subject.ddc300-
dc.titleEstimating Ad-Valorem Equivalents of Non-Tariff Measures on Products Subject to China Compulsory Certification-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.creator.othernameEun Mi Jung-
dc.format.pageviii, 70 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major국제대학원 국제학과-
dc.date.awarded2019. 8-
Appears in Collections:
국제대학원 > 국제학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE