View : 957 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author송완-
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-01T16:30:29Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-01T16:30:29Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn1558-7673-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-22794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/250368-
dc.description.abstractWe investigated the role of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) for prediction of upgrading in patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancers. After retrospective analysis of 443 patients, clinical parameters with PI-RADSv2 showed significantly higher accuracy for upgrading compared with clinical parameters alone. PI-RADSv2 might be used as a preoperative imaging tool to determine risk classification. Introduction: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADSv2) on prediction of postoperative Gleason score (GS) upgrading for patients with biopsy GS 6 prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 443 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radical prostatectomy for biopsy-proven GS 6 prostate cancer between January 2011 and December 2013. Preoperative clinical variables and pathologic GS were examined, and all MRI findings were assessed with PI-RADSv2. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare predictive accuracies of multivariate logistic regression models with or without PI-RADSv2. Results: Of the total 443 patients, 297 (67.0%) experienced GS upgrading postoperatively. PI-RADSv2 scores 1 to 3 and 4 to 5 were identified in 157 (25.4%) and 286 (64.6%) patients, respectively, and the rate of GS upgrading was 54.1% and 74.1%, respectively (P <.001). In multivariate analysis, prostate-specific antigen density > 0.16 ng/mL2, number of positive cores ≥ 2, maximum percentage of cancer per core > 20, and PI-RADSv2 score 4 to 5 were independent predictors influencing GS upgrading (each P <.05). When predictive accuracies of multivariate models with or without PI-RADSv2 were compared, the model including PI-RADSv2 was shown to have significantly higher accuracy (area under the curve, 0.729 vs. 0.703; P =.041). Conclusion: Use of PI-RADSv2 is an independent predictor of postoperative GS upgrading and increases the predictive accuracy of GS upgrading. PI-RADSv2 might be used as a preoperative imaging tool to determine risk classification and to help counsel patients with regard to treatment decision and prognosis of disease. © 2018 Elsevier Inc.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.-
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subjectPI-RADSv2-
dc.subjectProstate cancer-
dc.subjectRadical prostatectomy-
dc.subjectUpgrading-
dc.titleRole of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.relation.issue4-
dc.relation.volume16-
dc.relation.indexSCIE-
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS-
dc.relation.startpage281-
dc.relation.lastpage287-
dc.relation.journaltitleClinical Genitourinary Cancer-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.015-
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000439486400036-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85043514777-
dc.author.googleSong W.-
dc.author.googleBang S.H.-
dc.author.googleJeon H.G.-
dc.author.googleJeong B.C.-
dc.author.googleSeo S.I.-
dc.author.googleJeon S.S.-
dc.author.googleChoi H.Y.-
dc.author.googleKim C.K.-
dc.author.googleLee H.M.-
dc.date.modifydate20191114081000-
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE