View : 779 Download: 0

The application of Uro-vaxom®, urinary tract immunostimulator in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Title
The application of Uro-vaxom®, urinary tract immunostimulator in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain syndrome
Authors
Park S.J.Byun D.O.Shim B.S.
Ewha Authors
심봉석
SCOPUS Author ID
심봉석scopusscopus
Issue Date
2005
Journal Title
Korean Journal of Urology
ISSN
0494-4747JCR Link
Citation
Korean Journal of Urology vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 810 - 814
Indexed
SCOPUS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Purpose: There are a variety of techniques for treating chronic prostatitis. Regardless of the presence of infections, antibiotics were arbitrarily prescribed for 4-12 weeks, but there seemed to be ongoing debate of their effectiveness and side effects. Uro-vaxom® is known as an effective treatment for urinary tract infection due to its initiation the urothelial immune system activity. This study was performed to investigate for the possibility of Uro-vaxom® as a drug for use in non-inflammatory chronic prostatitis. Materials and methods: 95 patients, diagnosed as chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) (National Institutes of Health (NIH)-category IIIB), were divided into three groups: group A, 35 patients were given levofloxacin 100mg TID and Uro-vaxom® 60mg OD for the first 4 weeks, followed by only Uro-vaxom® 60mg OD for the next 8 weeks; group B, 30 patients were given only Uro-vaxom® 60mg OD before breakfast for 12 weeks; group C, the patients were treated with levofloxacin 100mg TID for 4 weeks. All the patients were reevaluated 4 weeks and 12 weeks later. Results: The initial diagnostic stati, the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (CPSI) were 25.1±2.7, 24.4±3.2 and 24.7±2.2 for groups A, B and C, respectively. In groups A and B, the NIH-CPSI after 12 weeks were 13.5±2.3 and 13.9±2.7, respectively, and showed noticeable improvements (p<0.05). In group C, the NIH-CPSI was 15.7±3.4, which was less improved compared to groups A and B (p>0.05). No patients experienced any adverse symptoms due to Uro- vaxom® intake. Conclusions: Uro-vaxom® could be appointed as an alternative method for the treatment of chronic prostatitis.
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE