View : 45 Download: 0

Patterns of public participation: Opportunity structures and mobilization from a cross-national perspective

Title
Patterns of public participation: Opportunity structures and mobilization from a cross-national perspective
Authors
Slutsky J.Tumilty E.Max C.Lu L.Tantivess S.Hauegen R.C.Whitty J.A.Weale A.Pearson S.D.Tugendhaft A.Wang H.Staniszewska S.Weerasuriya K.Ahn J.Cubillos L.
Ewha Authors
안정훈
SCOPUS Author ID
안정훈scopus
Issue Date
2016
Journal Title
Journal of Health, Organisation and Management
ISSN
1477-7266JCR Link
Citation
vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 751 - 768
Keywords
Contestatory participationCross-national comparisonsPriority settingPublic participationResource allocation
Publisher
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
Indexed
SCOPUS scopus
Abstract
Purpose – The paper summarizes data from 12 countries, chosen to exhibit wide variation, on the role and place of public participation in the setting of priorities. The purpose of this paper is to exhibit cross-national patterns in respect of public participation, linking those differences to institutional features of the countries concerned. Design/methodology/approach – The approach is an example of case-orientated qualitative assessment of participation practices. It derives its data from the presentation of country case studies by experts on each system. The country cases are located within the historical development of democracy in each country. Findings – Patterns of participation are widely variable. Participation that is effective through routinized institutional processes appears to be inversely related to contestatory participation that uses political mobilization to challenge the legitimacy of the priority setting process. No system has resolved the conceptual ambiguities that are implicit in the idea of public participation. Originality/value – The paper draws on a unique collection of country case studies in participatory practice in prioritization, supplementing existing published sources. In showing that contestatory participation plays an important role in a sub-set of these countries it makes an important contribution to the field because it broadens the debate about public participation in priority setting beyond the use of minipublics and the observation of public representatives on decision-making bodies. © 2016, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
DOI
10.1108/JHOM-03-2016-0037
Appears in Collections:
신산업융합대학 > 융합보건학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE