View : 1030 Download: 488

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김규보*
dc.contributor.author박경란*
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-15T08:02:06Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-15T08:02:06Z-
dc.date.issued2017*
dc.identifier.issn1949-2553*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-20094*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/234524-
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose: This study was performed to determine optimal radiation dose in pN1 breast cancer patients who received breast conserving surgery (BCS) and anthracycline plus taxane (AT)-based chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were performed in 1,147 patients who were treated between January 2006 and December 2010. The impact of radiation dose on treatment outcomes was evaluated. Results: Median follow-up time was 66 months. The 5-year rate of disease-free survival (DFS) was 93.2%. Larger tumor size (> 20 mm), positive lymphovascular invasion, high histologic grade, and high ratio of positive nodes (> 0.1) were significantly associated with inferior DFS. By using the 4 factors related to DFS, patients were categorized into high-risk (with >= 3 factors) and low-risk (with < 3 factors) groups. In the high-risk group, higher radiation dose (> 60.3 Gy(EQD2)) was significantly associated with better DFS than the lower dose (<= 60.3 Gy(EQD2)). However, the radiation dose did not impact DFS in the low-risk group. Conclusions: Dosing of radiation affects the outcome of post-BCS radiotherapy in pN1 breast cancer. Doses of over 60.3 Gy(EQD2) were associated with better outcome in the high-risk patients.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.publisherIMPACT JOURNALS LLC*
dc.subjectbreast neoplasms*
dc.subjectradiotherapy*
dc.subjectdose-response relationship*
dc.subjectprognosis*
dc.titleOptimal radiation dose for patients with one to three lymph node positive breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery and anthracycline plus taxane-based chemotherapy: A retrospective multicenter analysis (KROG 1418)*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue1*
dc.relation.volume8*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage1796*
dc.relation.lastpage1804*
dc.relation.journaltitleONCOTARGET*
dc.identifier.doi10.18632/oncotarget.12882*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000391503300140*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85009820816*
dc.author.googleKim, Haeyoung*
dc.author.googlePark, Won*
dc.author.googleYu, Jeong Il*
dc.author.googleChoi, Doo Ho*
dc.author.googleHuh, Seung Jae*
dc.author.googleKim, Yeon-Joo*
dc.author.googleLee, Eun Sook*
dc.author.googleLee, Keun Seok*
dc.author.googleKang, Han-Sung*
dc.author.googlePark, In Hae*
dc.author.googleShin, Kyung Hwan*
dc.author.googleKim, Kyubo*
dc.author.googlePark, Kyung Ran*
dc.author.googleKim, Yong Bae*
dc.author.googleAhn, Sung Ja*
dc.author.googleLee, Jong Hoon*
dc.author.googleKim, Jin Hee*
dc.author.googleChun, Mison*
dc.author.googleLee, Hyung-Sik*
dc.author.googleKim, Jung Soo*
dc.author.googleLee, Jong-Young*
dc.contributor.scopusid김규보(8213302900)*
dc.contributor.scopusid박경란(14040340300;57203047823;57207108839;57308917900)*
dc.date.modifydate20240222162403*


qrcode

BROWSE