View : 792 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김광옥*
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-15T08:02:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-02-15T08:02:50Z-
dc.date.issued2007*
dc.identifier.issn0950-3293*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-3736*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/234200-
dc.description.abstractUsing a Rank-Rating protocol and a traditional protocol whereby stimuli could not be re-tasted nor the scores be reviewed and modified, judges' performance on category and line scales of intensity, in terms of the number of 'different-stimulus' scaling errors, was compared. A different stimulus scaling error was defined as giving a perceptually more intense stimulus an equal or lower score than a perceptually less intense stimulus. The scales compared were 9- and 20-point category scales and 10 and 20 cm line scales. The stimuli were beef flavored soups of varying saltiness and orange flavored gelatin cubes of varying sweetness. There was a tendency for longer scales (20-point category, 20 cm line) to yield fewer 'different-stimulus' scaling errors than the shorter scales (9-point category, 10 cm line). © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.title'Different-stimulus' scaling errors; effects of scale length*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue2*
dc.relation.volume18*
dc.relation.indexSCI*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage362*
dc.relation.lastpage368*
dc.relation.journaltitleFood Quality and Preference*
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.03.021*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000243158400020*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-33750018936*
dc.author.googlePark J.-Y.*
dc.author.googleO'Mahony M.*
dc.author.googleKim K.-O.*
dc.contributor.scopusid김광옥(7409315718;57193501163)*
dc.date.modifydate20240322114551*
Appears in Collections:
공과대학 > 식품생명공학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE