View : 115 Download: 0
Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma a meta-analysis
- Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for management of endometrial carcinoma a meta-analysis
- Ju W.; Myung S.-K.; Kim Y.; Choi H.J.; Kim S.C.
- Ewha Authors
- 김승철; 주웅
- SCOPUS Author ID
- 김승철; 주웅
- Issue Date
- Journal Title
- International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
- International Journal of Gynecological Cancer vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 400 - 406
- SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS
- Document Type
- Background: This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the outcome of laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma compared with laparotomy. Methods: We searched the MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, and Cochrane Review databases in September 2007. Three independent evaluators selected the articles according to predetermined selection criteria. Results: Thirteen comparative studies (5 prospective and 8 retrospective) that met the selection criteria were included. In a fixed-effects meta-analysis, the overall survival and the recurrence rate showed no significant differences between the laparoscopy and the laparotomy groups, with odds ratios of 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.62) and 0.90 (95% confidence interval, 0.49-1.16), respectively. However, the complication rate was lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group with an odds ratio of 0.43 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.58). Conclusions: The survival outcome and recurrence rate after laparoscopic surgery for endometrial carcinoma were similar to those in the laparotomy procedures. However, the complication rate was lower after laparoscopy compared with laparotomy.
- Appears in Collections:
- 의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.