View : 869 Download: 0

Change of Ultrasound Estimated Bladder Weight and Bladder Wall Thickness After Treatment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction With Dutasteride

Title
Change of Ultrasound Estimated Bladder Weight and Bladder Wall Thickness After Treatment of Bladder Outlet Obstruction With Dutasteride
Authors
Lee, Ha NaLee, Young-SukHan, Deok HyunLee, Kyu-Sung
Ewha Authors
이하나
SCOPUS Author ID
이하나scopus
Issue Date
2017
Journal Title
LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS
ISSN
1757-5664JCR Link

1757-5672JCR Link
Citation
LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 67 - 74
Keywords
5-reductase inhibitorbladder outlet obstructionbladder wall thicknesslower urinary tract symptomultrasound estimated bladder weight
Publisher
WILEY
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the change of bladder wall hypertrophy to relieve bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) by treatment with 5-reductase inhibitor. MethodsMen who have BOO confirmed by urodynamic study (BOO index 40) were treated with dutasteride 0.5mg once a day for 6months. We measured ultrasound estimated bladder weight (UEBW), UEBW divided by body surface area (UEBW/BSA), and bladder wall thickness (BWT) before and after treatment. Changes in LUTS parameters were assessed by using the International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry, residual urine volume, prostate volume, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and LUTS outcome scores (LOS). Correlation between the change of LUTS parameters and UEBW, UEBW/BSA, and BWT were evaluated. We assessed the changes of bladder wall hypertrophy according to the results of benefit, satisfaction, and willingness to continue (BSW) questionnaire. ResultsThirty patients completed the 6-month study. The mean UEBW was 47.107.79g before and 50.07 +/- 5.39g after dutasteride treatment (P=0.259). The mean UEBW/BSA was 26.47 +/- 4.30g/m(2) before and 28.2 +/- 3.53g/m(2) after treatment (P=0.253), and there was no definite change in mean BWT after treatment (P=0.301). Most LUTS parameters including LOS significantly improved. Increased BOO index value was related to decreased BWT (=0.361, P=0.049). There was no definite change in mean UEBW, UEBW/BSA, and BWT according to the results of the BSW questionnaire. ConclusionsThere was no change in UEBW, UEBW/BSA and BWT despite improving most clinical parameters suggesting BOO. The changes of bladder wall hypertrophy parameters still have limitations to directly reflect the relief of BOO.
DOI
10.1111/luts.12110
Appears in Collections:
의료원 > 의료원 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE