View : 522 Download: 0

Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, single-blind and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy

Title
Midazolam for patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A prospective, single-blind and randomized study to determine the appropriate amount and time of initiation of endoscopy
Authors
Yi S.Y.Shin J.E.
Ewha Authors
이선영
SCOPUS Author ID
이선영scopusscopus
Issue Date
2005
Journal Title
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
ISSN
0815-9319JCR Link
Citation
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1873 - 1879
Indexed
SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Background and Aims: Midazolam is currently the most used sedative agent in endoscopy. The present study was designed to examine the appropriate dose of midazolam, time of initiation of endoscopy after midazolam infusion, and to prove the necessity of flumazenil as an antidote. Methods: One hundred and eighty patients undergoing diagnostic gastroscopy were assigned three different amounts of intravenous midazolam in prospective, single-blinded and randomized setting as follows: (i) group I 0.03 mg/kg midazolam; (ii) group II 0.06 mg/kg midazolam; and (iii) group III 0.09 mg/kg midazolam. Endoscopy was initiated 30, 60 and 90 s after infusion of midazolam within each group. After endoscopy, patients were divided into two groups, one receiving flumazenil and one placebo in a double-blind fashion. The ease of the procedure, the conscious sedative state, the paradoxical response, the level of satisfaction and anterograde amnesia were assessed using a 100 mm visual analog scale. Results: The endoscopist's assessments were not changed by the different doses of midazolam; however, significant differences were observed in the paradoxical responses (P < 0.05). The level of satisfaction with endoscopy was notably different between group I and the other two groups (P < 0.05). Amnesia was boosted according with increasing doses of midazolam (P < 0.05). The time until discharge after endoscopy was significantly different between group III and the other two groups (P < 0.05) and the discharge time was reduced in the flumazenil subgroup compared with the placebo subgroup in group III (P < 0.05). Group II (0.06 mg/kg) reported good levels of satisfaction, fewer paradoxical responses and short discharge time without any side-effects. Comparing the time of initiation of endoscopy (at 30, 60 and 90 s after midazolam) in each group, there were no significant differences in the level of satisfaction, conscious sedative state and amnesia. Conclusions: Midazolam should be administered at a dose of 0.06 mg/kg and the endoscopy should be initiated 30 s after midazolam injection for appropriate effects without any side-effects. Flumazenil is not necessary, except in the case of the use of a high dose (above 0.09 mg/kg) of midazolam. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.
DOI
10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.04081.x
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE