View : 26 Download: 0
Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis
- Sirolimus- versus paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis
- Sang H.L.; Ko Y.-G.; Jang Y.; Hyuck M.K.; Lee S.-H.; Yoon J.H.; Si H.P.; Byung O.K.; Dong W.J.; Joo Y.Y.; Ryu S.-K.
- Ewha Authors
- SCOPUS Author ID
- Issue Date
- Journal Title
- vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 181 - 185
- SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS
- We performed this study in order to compare the immediate and mid-term outcomes of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in lesions of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA). We assessed 54 patients from 5 centers who had undergone unprotected LMCA stenting (35 SES and 19 PES). The procedural success rates were 100 and 95%, respectively, in the SES and PES patients (p = 0.19). At the 6-month clinical follow-up, the event-free probability was 100% in the SES group, and 88% in the PES group (p = 0.07). At the 6-month angiographic follow-up (n = 24), the SES group exhibited a slightly lower late loss than did the PES group (0.24 ± 0.44 vs. 0.65 ± 0.60 mm, p = 0.09), and the restenosis rates were 8 and 9% (p = 0.94) in the SES and PES patients, respectively. In conclusion, both groups exhibited excellent in-hospital and 6-month outcomes with no significant differences between them. Copyright © 2005 S. Karger AG.
- Appears in Collections:
- 의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.