View : 550 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author문영철*
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-28T10:08:44Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-28T10:08:44Z-
dc.date.issued2013*
dc.identifier.issn0268-3369*
dc.identifier.otherOAK-9941*
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/223595-
dc.description.abstractThe aims of this study were to investigate the outcomes of second salvage auto-SCT and to identify the impacts of a second auto-SCT compared with systemic chemotherapy alone on disease outcome. Data from 48 patients who underwent second auto-SCT were matched to 144 patients (1:3) who received systemic chemotherapy alone from the Korean Myeloma Registry. Groups were matched for nine potential prognostic factors and compared for treatment outcomes. The median age of matching-pairs at relapse was 55.5 years. A total of 156 patients (81%) received vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone induction therapy before the first auto-SCT. Thirty-five patients (73%) in the second auto-SCT group received novel agent-based therapies before the second auto-SCT, and similar proportion in both groups received novel therapies after relapse of front-line auto-SCT. With a median follow-up of 55.3 months, patients who underwent a second auto-SCT had significantly better median OS (55.5 vs 25.4 months, P=0.035). In multivariate analysis for OS, <18 months time to progression after first auto-SCT, International Staging System III and salvage chemotherapy alone were independent predictors for worse OS. The outcomes of second auto-SCT appear to be superior to those of systemic chemotherapy alone. A randomized trial comparing both treatment strategies is required. © 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.*
dc.languageEnglish*
dc.titleMatched-pair analysis to compare the outcomes of a second salvage auto-SCT to systemic chemotherapy alone in patients with multiple myeloma who relapsed after front-line auto-SCT*
dc.typeArticle*
dc.relation.issue3*
dc.relation.volume48*
dc.relation.indexSCI*
dc.relation.indexSCIE*
dc.relation.indexSCOPUS*
dc.relation.startpage425*
dc.relation.lastpage432*
dc.relation.journaltitleBone Marrow Transplantation*
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/bmt.2012.164*
dc.identifier.wosidWOS:000316920100017*
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84875222958*
dc.author.googleYhim H.-Y.*
dc.author.googleKim K.*
dc.author.googleKim J.S.*
dc.author.googleKang H.J.*
dc.author.googleKim J.-A.*
dc.author.googleMin C.-K.*
dc.author.googleBae S.H.*
dc.author.googlePark E.*
dc.author.googleYang D.-H.*
dc.author.googleSuh C.*
dc.author.googleKim M.K.*
dc.author.googleMun Y.-C.*
dc.author.googleEom H.S.*
dc.author.googleShin H.J.*
dc.author.googleYoon H.-J.*
dc.author.googleKwon J.H.*
dc.author.googleLee J.H.*
dc.author.googleKim Y.S.*
dc.author.googleYoon S.-S.*
dc.author.googleKwak J.-Y.*
dc.contributor.scopusid문영철(7003363716)*
dc.date.modifydate20240422115947*
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE