Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김세화 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-08-28T12:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-28T12:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0353-5150 | - |
dc.identifier.other | OAK-8480 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/222374 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I examine Takashi Yagisawa's response to van Inwagen's ontic objection against David Lewis. Van Inwagen criticizes Lewis's commitment to the absolutely unrestricted sense of 'there is,' and Yagisawa claims that by adopting modal tenses he avoids commitment to absolutely unrestricted quantification. I argue that Yagisawa faces a problem parallel to the one Lewis faces. Although Yagisawa officially rejects the absolutely unrestricted sense of a quantifying expression, he is still committed to the absolutely unrestricted sense of 'is a real.' © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.title | Modal Tense and the Absolutely Unrestricted Quantifier | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.relation.issue | 1 | - |
dc.relation.volume | 27 | - |
dc.relation.index | AHCI | - |
dc.relation.index | SCOPUS | - |
dc.relation.startpage | 73 | - |
dc.relation.lastpage | 76 | - |
dc.relation.journaltitle | Acta Analytica | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12136-011-0128-y | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | WOS:000300512800007 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84857440746 | - |
dc.author.google | Kim S. | - |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 김세화(25027862400;57007302900) | - |
dc.date.modifydate | 20230616150547 | - |