View : 569 Download: 0

Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone

Title
Comparison of implant stability after different implant surface treatments in dog bone
Authors
Kim S.-J.Kim M.-R.Rim J.-S.Chung S.-M.Shin S.-W.
Ewha Authors
김명래김선종
SCOPUS Author ID
김명래scopus; 김선종scopus
Issue Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal of Applied Oral Science
ISSN
1678-7757JCR Link
Citation
Journal of Applied Oral Science vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 415 - 420
Indexed
SCIE; SCOPUS WOS scopus
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the effects of different implant surface treatments on implant stability in dog mandibles. Material and Methods: A total of 30 implants (Dentium Co, Seoul, Korea) were placed in 5 dog mandibles. Bone quality was assessed at each site. Implant stability was evaluated using 2 different methods. An Osstell™ resonance frequency analyzer (RFA) was used to determine the stability at baseline (day 1), and 3, 6 and 10 weeks after surgery. Animals were euthanized 10 weeks after implant installation. Specimens were obtained and submitted to the laboratory processing. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. All implantation sites in dog mandibles demonstrated bone types II and III. Results and Conclusions: All implants showed good primary stability at baseline in terms of insertion torque. The results of this study suggest that surface treatment may have significant effects on biological stability 3 weeks after implant placement. Further studies are needed to confirm these initial observations in poor quality bone.
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE