View : 269 Download: 0
Ing forms and the progressive puzzle: A construction-based approach to English progressives
- Ing forms and the progressive puzzle: A construction-based approach to English progressives
- Lee S.-A.
- Ewha Authors
- SCOPUS Author ID
- Issue Date
- Journal Title
- Journal of Linguistics
- vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 153 - 195
- SSCI; AHCI; SCOPUS
- This paper argues for a constructional approach to English progressives. On this view, progressivity is a construction-level property, rather than a lexical property of the ing forms that progressive verb phrases contain or of the auxiliary. The incompatibility of ing forms with state verbs in progressive constructions provides crucial evidence in support of the construction-based perspective, given that Stative ing forms are fully acceptable in gerundive and other ing constructions. Of course, underlying this approach is the proposal that gerund is neutralizable with present participle (Huddleston 1984, 2002b, c; Pullum 1991; Blevins 1994). A lexicalist and construction-based analysis of gerundive nominals, as in Pullum (1991) and Blevins (1994), offers a means of claiming that progressivity is a property of the combination of an auxiliary and ing participle, just as the perfect aspect is expressed by the combination of have and a past participle, as proposed in Ackerman & Webelhuth (1998) and Spencer (2001b), and implicitly in Curme (1935) and other traditional grammars. © 2007 Cambridge University Press.
- Appears in Collections:
- 인문과학대학 > 영어영문학전공 > Journal papers
- Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
- RIS (EndNote)
- XLS (Excel)
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.