View : 30 Download: 0

Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS)

Title
Validation of the International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS)
Authors
Kim Y.Jung K.Y.Kim C.-Y.Kim Y.-I.Shin Y.
Ewha Authors
정구영
SCOPUS Author ID
정구영scopus
Issue Date
2000
Journal Title
Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
ISSN
1079-6061JCR Link
Citation
vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 280 - 285
Indexed
SCOPUS WOS scopus
Abstract
Objective: To compare the predictive power of International Classification of Diseases 10th Edition (ICD-10) -based International Classification of Diseases 9th Edition-based Injury Severity Score (ICISS) with Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and ICD-9CM-based ICISS in the injury severity measure. Methods: ICD-10 version of survival risk ratios was derived from 47,750 trauma patients from 35 emergency centers for 1 year. The predictive power of TRISS, the ICD-9CM-based ICISS and ICD- 10-based ICISS were compared in a group of 367 severely injured patients admitted to two university hospitals. The predictive power was compared by using the measures of discrimination (disparity, sensitivity, specificity, misclassification rates, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics), all calculated by logistic regression procedure. Results: ICD-10-based ICISS showed a lower performance than TRISS and ICD-9CM-based ICISS. When age and Revised Trauma Score were incorporated into the survival probability model, however, ICD-10-based ICISS full model showed a similar predictive power compared with TRISS and ICD-9CM-based ICISS full model. ICD-10-based ICISS had some disadvantages in predicting outcomes among patients with intracranial injuries. However, such weakness was largely compensated by incorporating age and Revised Trauma Score in the model. Conclusion: The ICISS methodology can be extended to ICD-10 horizon as a standard injury severity measure in the place of TRISS, especially when age and Revised Trauma Score were incorporated in the model. For patients with intracranial injuries, the predictive power of ICD-10-based ICISS was relatively low because of differences in the classifying system between ICD-10 and ICD- 9CM.
Appears in Collections:
의과대학 > 의학과 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

BROWSE