View : 616 Download: 0

Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children

Title
Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic model of propofol externally validated in children
Authors
Choi, Byung-MoonLee, Hyun-GuByon, Hyo-JinLee, Soo-HanLee, Eun-KyungKim, Hee-SooNoh, Gyu-Jeong
Ewha Authors
이은경
SCOPUS Author ID
이은경scopusscopus
Issue Date
2015
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS
ISSN
1567-567XJCR Link

1573-8744JCR Link
Citation
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 163 - 177
Keywords
PropofolPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamics
Publisher
SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
Indexed
SCI; SCIE; SCOPUS WOS
Document Type
Article
Abstract
There have been no pharmacokinetic parameters and blood-brain equilibration rate constant (k (e0)) of propofol obtained in a single population of children, by which propofol can be administered using a target effect-site concentration controlled infusion. Thirty-nine, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-2 children aged 2-12 years were given an intravenous bolus of propofol (3 mg kg(-1)), followed by infusion (200 A mu g kg(-1) min(-1)). Arterial drug concentrations and bispectral index (BIS) values were measured. Population pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis was performed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. External model validation was performed in a separate population of children. A two-compartment model and a sigmoid E (max) model directly linked by an effect compartment well described the time courses of propofol concentration and BIS. The estimates of parameters were: V (1) (L) = 1.69, V (2) (L) = 27.2 + 0.929 x (weight - 25), Cl (L min(-1)) = 0.893 x (weight/23.6)(0.966), Q (L min(-1)) = 1.3; E (0) = 76.9; E (max) = 35.4, Ce (50) (mu g mL(-1)) = 3.47 - (0.095 x age) - (1.63 x mean infusion rate of remifentanil in A mu g kg(-1) min(-1)); gamma = 2.1; and k (e0) (min(-1)) = 0.371. Pooled biases (95 % CI) of the target effect-site concentration controlled infusion system of propofol was -20.2 % (-23.3 to -18.1 %) and pooled inaccuracy was 30.4 % (28.6-32.7 %). Pooled biases of BIS prediction was -6.8 % (-9.1 to -4.1 %) and pooled inaccuracies was 19.1 % (17.5-20.9 %).The altered weight-based dose requirements of propofol are well described pharmacokinetically, and pharmacodynamically. Predictive performances of the TCI system in this study were clinically acceptable.
DOI
10.1007/s10928-015-9408-2
Appears in Collections:
자연과학대학 > 통계학전공 > Journal papers
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE