View : 584 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author최현정-
dc.creator최현정-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T10:08:04Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26T10:08:04Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000034664-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/200898-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000034664-
dc.description.abstractGenerally, "Golden shares" is a preferred stock held in a corporation that government retains after privatization. These shares can allow a shareholder special rights: individual approval of major management decisions, vetoes of mergers and acquisitions, changes in the line of business, limitation on shareholdings. Absolute veto and decision making power in the general meeting are characteristics of golden shares. and golden share's arrangement relates to changes in company's shareholder structure. These are devices of specific influence by general company law or special legislation. Golden share's arrangement generally has a limited-time period and a limited scope of control right. Sometimes, the special rights automatically terminate after determined period. Golden shares have been designed to protect the national interest: strategic industries to the national economy, sensitive economy spheres, national strategy industries. Chater3 describes the characteristic and practical use of golden shares in England and France. Up to recently, the retention of these shares was a popular device used by European Community Members States in order to retain control of businesses that had been privatized. But the European Court of Justice has raised serious problems as to the legality of these golden shares under the EC treaty. The ECJ did not rule that all arrangements of golden shares are incompatible with the EC treaty. Anyhow, The ECJ requires the appropriate subject of the golden shares and the least restrictive means of achieving the objective of golden shares arrangement. In Korea, The golden shares have been debated in relation to privatization of public enterprises. All of privatizing public enterprises don't require golden shares. However, It is effective for the government to retain these in the monopoly privatizing enterprises which are still very important in the national economy. Surely, It can be said that the government has the golden shares in the privatized enterprises, bank, or various private companies on the company law in the light of Chater 4. But With adoption of golden shares in Korea, Problems such as the principle of shareholder equality, right of exquisitor, the government's economic intervention may arise. It is desirable to consider exceptional usages in limited areas in need of adoption of golden shares related to national interest, strategy.-
dc.description.tableofcontents제1장 서론 = 1 제2장 황금주 일반론 = 4 제1절 역사적 배경 = 4 제2절 황금주의 의의 = 6 1. 황금주의 개념 = 6 2. 황금주의 속성 = 7 (1) 특별한 주식 = 7 (2)거부권(veto right) = 10 (3)특별주주(special shareholder) = 11 3. 황금주의 권리의 내용 = 13 (1) 회사지배에 영향을 주는 경우 = 13 (2) 특정인의 지분소유한도에 대한 규제권한 = 15 (3) 기타 = 16 제3절 황금주의 기능 = 17 1. 국가 개입의 정당화 = 17 2. 국가 이익의 보호 = 17 (1) 전략적 산업 = 18 (2) 정치적으로 민감한 경제 영역 = 20 (3) 상징적으로 중요한 국가산업 = 21 제4절 소결 = 22 제3장 각국의 제도 = 23 제1절 서설 = 23 제2절 영국 = 24 1. 황금주 제도의 의의 = 24 2. 황금주의 법적 근거 = 25 (1) 황금주와 영국회사법 = 25 (2) Bushell v Faith = 27 (3) 정관의 규정 = 29 3. 황금주의 운용실태 = 31 (1)BT 3차매각 = 31 (2)영국석유회사(British Petroleum) = 32 4. 유럽재판소 판결 = 33 제3절 프랑스 = 34 1. 황금주 제도의 의의 = 34 2. 황금주 법적 근거 = 35 (1) 1986년 민영화법 = 35 (2) 1993년 민영화법 = 36 3. 황금주의 운용실태 = 38 4. 유럽재판소 판결 = 39 제4장 황금주 도입에 대한 논의 = 39 제1절 황금주의 기능에 대한 찬반 논의 = 40 1. 황금주에 반대하는 입장 = 40 2. 황금주에 찬성하는 입장 = 42 제2절 도입의 인정여부 = 44 1. 도입 필요성 = 44 2. 도입의 가능성 = 45 3. 황금주의 적용범위 = 46 (1) 공기업 = 46 (2) 민영화된 공기업 = 47 (3) 은행 = 50 (4) 기타 상법상 회사 = 52 제3절 도입에 대한 구체적 검토 = 54 1. 주주평등의 문제 = 54 2. 인수자의 자율권 = 57 3.민영화 후에 국가에게 특별결정력 부여에 관한 논의 = 57 제5장 결론 = 58 참조자료 = 62 Abstract = 68-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1778941 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 대학원-
dc.title황금주(Golden Shares)의 도입에 관한 입법론적 연구-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.format.pageiii, 69 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major대학원 법학과-
dc.date.awarded2004. 8-
Appears in Collections:
일반대학원 > 법학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE