Choreography의 歷史的 變遷에 대한 考察

Abstract

本 연구의 목적은 Choreography의 역사에 관하여, 두가지 범주로 분류되는 유형을 상호비교하고 그 변천과정에 대하여 고찰하는 것에 있다. 첫째, 코레오그라피의 개념을 규정하고, Ballet의 탄생 이래 계속되어왔다고 인정되는 保守派(Lullist)와 改革派(Ramist)의 대립을 A. Haskell의 按舞史的 견해와 연관시켰다. 둘째, 코레오그라피의 역사적 변천과정을 연구하되, 각 시대의 대표적 안무가 중심으로 행하였다. 셋째, 각 시대의 안무방식을 두가지 유형으로 분류하고 양자를 비교 연구하였다. 마지막에 코레오그라피는 동작적 안무와 표현적 안무의 상호 교차로서 辨證法的인 변천과정을 이루어왔다는 결론이 도출되었다.;The purpose of this study is to compare some types of dance in two catagories through the historically transitional process of choreography. First, the concept of choreography was defined, then a hypothesis, that the history of ballet dance was the one of intersecting development-process of the motional dance and the expressional dance and in which confrontation between Iullist and Lamist existed since the beginning of ballet was applied to a claim by A.Haskell, is used as a theoretical background for this study. Second, in the first half part of this thesis. some of the transitional process of ballet dance was studied, centered on some dancers who could represent characteristic dances of each era, and in the latter part, as arranging all the dances from each era into two catagories, then differences between those two kind dances were compared with and analysed on the basis of lituratural, artistic, musical, and physical factors, respectively. However, in this study course, analysis of each factor was only an approach to comparing those two types of dance, and only the indication. of relative differences, and therefore, a fact was found out that any factor has its own characteristic, and does not mean absence or omission of other factors, and it is impossible to interprete any type of dance of a certain ear to be applied to only a kind of limitedly. In conclussion, the advent of a result that ballet dance has formed a dialectical developing process of the motional dance and the expressional dance could effectively approve the established hypothesis.