View : 669 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author구애경-
dc.creator구애경-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-26T12:08:38Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-26T12:08:38Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000071201-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/190301-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000071201-
dc.description.abstractTrademarks indicate the source of goods. Today they function not only guaranteeing the quality of goods but advertising trademarked goods which has accumulated. Goodwill for a long time especially the trademark gets the infinite value as well as commercial magnetism in itself. Therefore the view that trademark should be protected like property right is more and more widely accepted. The trademark dilution theory has developed through long discussion and many cases in the U.S. The theory originated from the notion that the consumers' recognition of the trademark value has not to be whittled away or tarnished, even if there is no possible confusion of the source of goods. Currently many countries and international organizations have regulations protecting famous trademarks not to be diluted. In addition, the dilution theory has been utilized as a reasonable solution of the conflict between the established trademark and the domain name which has been emerging as new goods identification mark with the develo pment of the internet. In February 2001, Korea introduced the dilution theory through revision of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Business Secret Protection Act. This thesis analyzes this new legislation and tries to suggest the proper extent of protection, execution methods, and improvement of the relevant provisions to be suitable for Korea situation. As stated above, the discussion on the prevention of trademark dilution is connected to the development of trademark functions and economic value of trademarks. As trademark functions have become diverse and the main purpose of trademark protection has been changing, the dilution theory has become embossed. This thesis examines the general theory trademarks for a background study and then looks into the concept and type of trademark dilution. Before examining the dilution theory which is a relatively new theory about trademark infringement, the traditional confusion theory has to be overviewed. Which method was used in the past to solve the problem of the trademark blurring and tarnishment? What's the limit of the past method of settlement? Since these matters has to be explored to understand necessity of dilution theory, the confusion theory is discussed in Chapter 3. On the basis of above discussion, in Chapter 4 deals with every detailed aspect of the dilution theory. First I made a general survey of the background of this theory in the U.S., the theory's homeland. The trademark issue is also the cause of international trade pressure. So it is necessary to investigate the induction of dilution theory in international agreements as well as in European Community and Japan which have been trading actively with Korea. Even though the trademark owner asserts the trademark infringement by dilution, it's not easy to recognize the phenomenon of tradem ark dilution. Some precedents of the U.S. applied the yardstick for judgment of the likelihood of confusion to the trademark infringement by dilution. The standard of judgment and the proving means are studied in depth. Next the conflict between trademarks and domain names is explored in the context of trademark dilution. The criticism against the dilution theory is thoroughly considered in Chapter 4, part 5 to avoid a blind adoption of the theory. As mentioned above, the main purpose of this thesis is to find out how to properly adapt the dilution theory to the Korea legal system. Chapter 5 covers the provisions protecting famous marks in the Korea Trademark Act, and the newly added provisions for the prevention of trademark dilution in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Business Secret Protection Act. Finally this thesis proposes the appropriate implementing methods and the direction for the legislative improvement.-
dc.description.tableofcontents제1장 서론 = 1 제2장 상표 희석화의 의의 = 5 제1절 상표보호 = 5 1. 상표의 의의 및 기능 = 5 2. 상표보호의 의의 = 9 3. 상표보호에 대한 비판적 시각 = 10 (1) 상표보호의 경쟁제한성 = 10 (2) 소비자이익의 침해가능성 = 12 제2절 상표 희석화 = 13 1. 상표 희석화의 개념 = 13 2. 상표 희석화의 유형 = 13 (1) 상표의 약화(Blurring)로 인한 희석화 = 14 (2) 상표의 손상(Tarnishment)으로 인한 희석화 = 15 제3장 상표 희석화에 대한 전통적 접근 - 혼동가능성 이론 = 16 제1절 혼동가능성 이론의 개념 = 16 제2절 혼동가능성의 판단기준 = 17 제3절 혼동가능성 이론의 확장을 통한 상표 희석화에의 적용 = 20 제4장 희석화 이론의 형성 및 발전 = 23 제1절 희석화 이론의 개념 = 23 제2절 희석화 이론의 형성배경 = 24 제3절 주요국의 희석화 이론의 전개 = 21 1. 미국 = 26 (1) 희석화 이론의 전개 = 26 (2) 연방상표희석화방지법 = 29 1) 규정 내용 = 29 2) 예외 조항 = 30 3) 특징 = 31 (3) 희석화와 관련된 주요 판례 = 32 1) 상표의 약화 = 33 2) 상표의 손상 = 37 2. 유럽의 공동체상표법(Community Trade Mark, CTM) = 40 (1) 공동체상표법의 개관 = 40 (2) 희석화에 관한 저명상표 보호규정 = 41 3. 일본 = 42 (1) 상표법 = 43 (2) 부정경쟁방지법에 의한 보호 = 44 4. 주요 국제협약 = 45 (1) 파리협약 = 45 (2) WTO/TRIPs협정 = 46 (3) WIPO 저명상표보호규범 = 48 1) 내용 = 48 2) 특징 = 51 제4절 희석화 이론의 내용 = 52 1. 희석화의 판단기준 = 53 (1) 상표 식별력이나 저명성의 정도 = 53 (2) 희석화의 우려(Likelihood of Dilution) = 55 2. 입증 문제 = 58 (1) 희석에 의한 실질적인 피해의 입증 필요성 = 58 (2) 희석화의 입증방법 = 59 3. 도메인 네임 분쟁과의 관련성 = 61 (1) 문제의 소재 = 61 (2) 도메인 네임 분쟁에의 희석화 이론 적용 = 62 (3) 도메인 네임 분쟁 사례 = 64 1) 미국 = 64 2) 우리나라 = 67 제5절 희석화 이론의 무용론에 대한 검토 = 69 1. 혼동가능성 이론과의 판단요소 중복 = 70 2. 상표권자의 지나친 권리확대 = 71 3. 경쟁원리의 유실 = 71 제5장 국내법의 현황 및 발전방향 = 73 제1절 상표법 = 73 1. 주지 저명상표의 보호규정 = 73 2. 평가 = 76 제2절 부정경쟁방지법의 최근 개정 = 78 제3절 발전방향 = 80 제6장 결론 = 84 참고문헌 = 87 ABSTRACT = 91-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent716696 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 대학원-
dc.title상표 희석화의 법리에 관한 연구-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.format.pageiii, 93 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major대학원 법학과-
dc.date.awarded2001. 8-
Appears in Collections:
일반대학원 > 법학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE