View : 637 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author金炫廷.-
dc.creator金炫廷.-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T06:08:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-25T06:08:15Z-
dc.date.issued1972-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000032548-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/183272-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000032548-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis deals mainly with the comparison of the typology between Heringer and Grebe in german. Both Heringer and Grebe are of the same dependence-grammar, but each has his own characteristics as shown below. 1. Heringer ..... Valence on the expression plane. → Calculation of the indices. 2. Grebe ........ Valence on the expression plane + Valence on the content plane → Calculation of the indices is impossible. (because valence on the expression plane and valence on the content plane are not always coincident.) Therefore my research tried to cover the following questions : 1. What are differences, coincidences and problems of typology between Heringer and Grebe? 2. What are the reasons of them? 3. What are the view-points of other school of german grammar about these problems? To give proper answer to the above questions this paper arranged in the follows order : 1. Explanation about Heringer's and Grebe's typology. 2. Comparison of the typology between Heringer and Grebe. a. Chart. b. Differences of conceptions. C. Coincidences of their typology. d. Differences of their typology. 3. Problems of their sentencetyps, which should be solved in any way.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsABSTRACT Ⅰ. 序論 = 1 Ⅱ. 本論 = 6 Ⅱ.1. Heringer의 Typologie 說明. = 6 Ⅱ.1.1. Heringer 의 Satz 分析. = 6 Ⅱ.1.2. V_(i)에 對하여 = 11 Ⅱ.1.3. VEBK^j_i.에 對하여 = 13 Ⅱ.1.4. PA_i,에 對하여 = 15 Ⅱ.2. Grebe의 Typolosie 設明. = 19 Ⅱ.2.1. Grebe의 Satz 分析. = 19 Ⅱ.2.2. 自動詞 Gruppe.(Zustands-, vorgangs- und Ta¨tigkei-tssa¨tze) = 21 Ⅱ.2.3. 他動詞 Gruppe(Handlungssa¨tze) = 25 Ⅱ.3. Heringer와 Grebe의 Satztypen 比較. = 28 Ⅱ.3.1. 圖表. = 28 Ⅱ.3.2. 槪念差異. = 31 Ⅱ.3.3. 兩者의 共同 Satztyren. = 34 Ⅱ.3.4. 兩者 Satztypen의 差異点 = 35 Ⅱ.3.4.1. Grebe에 있고 Heringer에 없는것. = 35 Ⅱ.3.4.2. Heringer에 있고 Grebe에 없는것. = 37 Ⅱ.3.4.3. Heringer의 Valenz가 Grebe에서 細分된 것. = 47 Ⅱ.3.4.4 Grebe의 Grdf.이 Heringer 에서 細分된것. = 48 Ⅲ. 結論 = 50 Ⅲ.1. 兩者 Satgtypen의 問題点. = 50 Ⅲ.1.1. Dativ 問題 = 50 Ⅲ.1.2. Sich 問題 = 52 Ⅲ.1.3. es 問題 = 54 Ⅲ.1.4. Grebe Sonderform에 對한 問題点. = 56 Ⅲ.1.5. Angabe와 Eranszung에 對하여. = 58 Ⅲ.1.6. Transformation에 對하여 = 59 Abku¨rzung = 60 參考文獻 = 62-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1954217 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectHeringer-
dc.subjectGerbe-
dc.subjectTopologie-
dc.titleHeringer와 Gerbe의 Topologie 比較와 이의 問題点-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.format.page62 p-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major대학원 독어독문학과-
dc.date.awarded1973. 2-
Appears in Collections:
일반대학원 > 독어독문학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE