View : 557 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author文彩楨-
dc.creator文彩楨-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T06:08:47Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-25T06:08:47Z-
dc.date.issued2002-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000026855-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/181770-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000026855-
dc.description.abstractRecently, financial environments-regulations, competitions, and uncertainties in both asset and liability side- are changing rapidly, but investors rebalance their portfolio over time. Therefore we need new model instead of single period investment model which is not enough to help investors make tlheir decisions about how to allocate their limited wealth to different assets. So this paper proposes multi-period asset management model. Multi-period Asset Management Model is considered to be more coherent portfolio management model than Mean-Variance model. Multi-period asset management model has property of multi-period and stochastic recourse model. This paper empirically tests 9 assets portfolio optimization using stochastic model and myopic deterministic model, then compare 2 models using back-testing (200l.l-2002.ll). As the result, when we compare 9 assets portfolios using bath stochastic and deterministic model, the optimal portfolio shows different asset weight, which deterministic model proposes whole wealth to be invested in manufacturing industry but stochastic model proposes wealth to be diversified to distribution industry and short term government bond (3m-ly). After back-testing this asset weight, we can show that stochastic model makes higher return. So we can say that stochastic propose more efficient portfolio than deterministic model. But the number of scenario is not sufficient for stochastic model aid some problems using user definition method still remain in this paper.-
dc.description.tableofcontents목차 제1장 서론 = 1 제1절 연구 배경 = 1 제2절 연구 목적 및 내용 = 2 제3절 논문 구성 = 3 제2장 확률계획법과 기존연구 = 4 제1절 확률 계획법 = 4 제2절 기존 연구 = 8 2.1 평균-분산모형 = 8 2.2 확률모형 (재수정모형) = 10 2.3 Russell-Yasuda 모형 (1994) = 14 제3장 실증분석 = 21 제1절 다기간 자산(부채)관리 모형 = 21 제2절 시나리오 생성 = 23 제3절 효용함수 = 27 제4절 실증결과 = 28 제4장 요약 및 결론 = 32 참고문헌 = 34 ABSTRACT = 38-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent1765113 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 대학원-
dc.subjectRussell-Yasuda모형-
dc.subject자산관리-
dc.subject확률계획법-
dc.subject경영학-
dc.titleRussell-Yasuda모형을 사용한 다기간 자산관리 실증연구-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.title.translated(A) Empirical Study on the Multi-period Asset Management Model using Russell-Yasuda Model-
dc.format.page[ii], 39 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major대학원 경영학과-
dc.date.awarded2003. 2-
Appears in Collections:
일반대학원 > 경영학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE