View : 728 Download: 0

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이정민-
dc.creator이정민-
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-25T06:08:45Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-25T06:08:45Z-
dc.date.issued2007-
dc.identifier.otherOAK-000000027847-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.ewha.ac.kr/handle/2015.oak/181747-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dcollection.ewha.ac.kr/jsp/common/DcLoOrgPer.jsp?sItemId=000000027847-
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this thesis are 1) to acknowledge seriousness of subsyance abuse of elderly. 2) to provide essenlial data to build up social stategies that improve elderly's basic right. the methodology employed for this study is content analsis over the cases of abused elderly and normal elderly who have requested from 1:1 interviews. the extent of abuse experience is mersured on the basic of the frequency of physical, psychological, and financial abuse and neglience. Self-esteem was evaluated based on the amount of support receivea from their acquaintances. Accordingly, questions are established to accomplish the aim of the research as follows: 1) A study of the Self-esteem difference abused elderly and normal elderly. 2) A study of the Self-esteem difference from normal characteristics. 3) A study of the Self-esteem difference from psychological characteristics. The interviews were conducted on the abused elderly and normal elderly who recommened by churchs and parks and local institutions using survey questionnaires among them, the 110 elderly became subject of the final analysis of the paper. The cocclusion of the research is as follows: Firstly, the types of abuse experience can be arranged as neglience abuse, financial abuse, psychological abuse and physical abuse in order of their frequency. When the abuse experience is converted into figures, the extent of abuse was averaged at 8.85, with neglience abuse making 3.17, financial abuse 2.67, psychological abuse 2.50, physical abuse 1.20, with the full mark at 100 points. Overall self-esteem given to the subject abuse elderly scored average 1.5545, and normal elderly scored average 2.1755. Secondly, in terms of the connection between general characteristics of the subjects and their self-esteem, there are: Perception of the sex, health and status status indicated statistically significant difference among differently categorized groups. In sum academic background, marital status, the type of sex, perception of health status, and that of statusone of the subjects were found to show statistical significance, varying on each group established according to above criteria. Thirdly, the higher extent of abuse experience was proved to dearease self-esteem. But the higher extent of relationship-satisfaction was proved to increase self-esteem. Fourthly, after the analysis, it was found that self-esteem had burrerings effect on relationship-satisfaction. Findings revealed by this research are as follows: Firstly, abuse experience harms the self-esteem of the elderly. Secondly, relationship-satisfaction assists to the self-esteem of the elderly. Thirdly, self-esteem has no burrering effect on tfe extent of abuse experienced by elderly. Summing up the implications and suggestions are as follows: 1) It is necessary to develop programs that are helping the abused elderly to response properlt, to protect themselves, and to ask appropriate supports. 2) The theoretical efforts to find out the causes of the elderly abuse should be continued and verified. 3) The standaraized instrument to clarify definitiln of the elderly abuse, classification of abuse types, and evaluation of the elderly abuse is need to develop further.-
dc.description.tableofcontentsⅠ. 서론 = 1 A. 문제제기 = 1 B. 연구의 목적 = 4 Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 = 5 A. 노인학대 = 5 1. 노인학대의 정의 및 유형 = 5 2. 노인학대의 일반이론 = 10 B. 노인학대에 미치는 요인 = 12 1. 피해자의 요인 = 12 2. 가해자의 요인 = 13 3. 피해자-가해자 관계 요인 = 14 4. 가정환경 요인 = 16 5. 사회환경 요인 = 16 6. 가족기능 (가족 스트레스 포함)의 원인 = 18 C. 연구분석틀 = 19 1. 연구문제 = 19 2. 연구모형 = 19 Ⅲ. 연구방법 = 21 A. 연구대상 및 범위 = 21 B. 측정도구 = 21 1. 종속변수(자아존중감 척도) = 21 1) 자아존중감 = 21 2. 독립변수 = 22 1) 노인 학대경험 = 22 2) 성별 = 22 3) 연령대 = 22 4) 학력 = 22 5) 배우자 유무 = 22 6) 노인의 건강상태 = 23 7) 노인의 경제상태 = 23 8) 관계만족도 = 23 9) 부양기대감 = 23 10) 의존성 = 23 C. 척도의 신뢰도 = 24 1. 학대노인 = 24 2. 비학대노인 = 24 D. 자료 분석 방법 = 25 E. 연구의 제한점 = 25 Ⅳ. 연구결과 = 26 A. 조사대상자(학대노인과 비학대노인)의 일반적특성과 조사대상자(학대노인)의 학대경험정도 = 26 1. 조사대상자(학대노인과 비학대노인)의 일반적 특성 = 26 2. 조사대상자(학대노인)의 학대경험정도 = 27 B. 학대여부에 따른 종속변수(자아존중감)차이 연구 = 32 1. 학대노인의 자아존중감 = 33 2. 비학대노인의 자아존중감 = 34 C. 일반적특성에 따른 종속변수(자아존중감)차이 연구 = 35 1. 성별에 따른 자아존중감차이 = 35 2. 연령대에 따른 자아존중감차이 = 35 3. 학력에 따른 자아존중감차이 = 36 4. 배우자 유무에 따른 자아존중감차이 = 36 5. 건강상태에 따른 자아존중감차이. = 37 6. 경제상태에 따른 자아존중감차이 = 37 D. 자아존중감에 미치는 영향 = 38 1. 일반적특성과 학대유형과 심리적특성과 자아존중감의 상관계수 = 38 2. 일반적 특성이 자아존중감에 미치는 영향 = 40 3. 학대유형이 자아존중감에 미치는 영향 = 40 4. 심리적특성이 자아존중감에 미치는 영향 = 41 Ⅴ. 결론 = 43 A. 연구결과 = 43 B. 논의 및 제언 = 46 C. 후속연구를 위한 제언 = 47 참고 문헌 = 48 Abstract = 52 부록 = 55-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent940945 bytes-
dc.languagekor-
dc.publisher이화여자대학교 대학원-
dc.subject.ddc360-
dc.title노인 학대경험이 자아존중감에 미치는 영향-
dc.typeMaster's Thesis-
dc.title.translatedThe Self-esteem to the Elderly from the Experience of Abuse-
dc.creator.othernameLee, Jung Min-
dc.format.pageiv, 61 p.-
dc.identifier.thesisdegreeMaster-
dc.identifier.major대학원 사회복지학과-
dc.date.awarded2007. 8-
Appears in Collections:
일반대학원 > 사회복지학과 > Theses_Master
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Export
RIS (EndNote)
XLS (Excel)
XML


qrcode

BROWSE