2015 | Affective discrimination methodology: Determination and use of a consumer-relevant sensory difference for food quality maintenance | 이혜성 | Article |
2010 | Comparison of d′ estimates produced by three versions of a duo-trio test for discriminating tomato juices with varying salt concentrations: The effects of the number and position of the reference stimulus | 이혜성 | Article |
2020 | Confirmation of odd sample bias in triadic design preference tests with a no-preference option, using confusable stimuli, and a solution | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2019 | Consumer acceptance measurement focusing on a specified sensory attribute of products: Can the attribute-specified degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method replace hedonic scaling? | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2015 | Consumer context-specific sensory acceptance tests: Effects of a cognitive warm-up on affective product discrimination | 이혜성 | Article |
2018 | Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: A signal detection measurement with higher reliability than hedonic scaling | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2018 | Degree of satisfaction-difference (DOSD) method for measuring consumer acceptance: Comparative and absolute measures of satisfaction based on signal detection theory | 이혜성 | Article |
2012 | Discriminations of the A-Not A difference test improved when " A" was familiarized using a brand image | 이혜성 | Article |
2015 | Duo-Trio Difference-Preference Test with Two Replications: Use of Psychological Biases for Measuring Meaningful Preference | 이혜성 | Article |
2020 | Effect of thinking style and consumption purpose on food choice: A case study with yogurt using a discrete choice experiment and eye-tracking | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2014 | Higher performance of constant-reference duo-trio test incorporating affective reference framing in comparison with triangle test | 이혜성 | Article |
2016 | Idiographic duo–trio tests using a constant-reference based on preference of each consumer: Sample presentation sequence in difference test can be customized for individual consumers to reduce error | 이혜성 | Article |
2012 | Investigation of operationally more powerful duo-trio test protocols: Effects of different reference schemes | 이혜성 | Article |
2019 | Investigation of test performance of the dual reminder A-Not A (DR A-Not A)in comparison to 3-AFC for discriminating samples of drinking water | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2022 | Reminder–preference test, affective difference-preference test using reference framing with a brand: 1. Sensitivity comparisons with the same–different difference–preference test | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |
2023 | Sensory test A-Not A rating signal detection: Panel's sensory learning and stability of decision criteria | 이혜성; 김민아 | Article |